>Sorry, I just gotta rant a bit... this is a really bad hack, that I wouldn't trust on a production system. Instead of doubling down and working on better IPv6 support with providers and in software configuration, and defining best practices for working with IPv6, they just kinda gloss over with a 'not supported yet'
Yeah, how pragmatic of them. Instead of for pie in the sky, let's all get together to pressure people to improve tons of infrastructure we don't own, action (which can always happen in parallel anyway) they solved their real problem NOW.
>and develop a whole system that will very likely break things in random ways.
Citation needed else it's just FUD. The links explained how it works well enough for that.
Yeah, how pragmatic of them. Instead of for pie in the sky, let's all get together to pressure people to improve tons of infrastructure we don't own, action (which can always happen in parallel anyway) they solved their real problem NOW.
>and develop a whole system that will very likely break things in random ways.
Citation needed else it's just FUD. The links explained how it works well enough for that.