Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

And another proprietary service ("make it an offline Chrome app"). It's the web, why would I want to be locked to a single vendor?


It is the path of least resistance to get to a 'Desktop' experience. And please, what are the alternatives?

Firefox ? I'm sorry, but Firefox lost relevance a couple of years ago now. Firefox is ethically the best , but it sucks in implementation. Firefox is now the broccoli of the web, stale broccoli at that.


ActiveX is pretty cool, and gives you a "desktop" experience. You should look into it if you like letting one corporation lock you into their proprietary version of the web.


a desktop app built with node-webkit would be better than a browser-specific app


How? All you're proposing is replacing one dependency with another.


At least there it's not really any different than shipping a WPF application that's tied to Windows. It's a desktop application, people are used to desktop applications being vendor-specific. I don't like the idea of people getting used to web apps being vendor-specific though. That's not okay. We have a chance to make it right this time. If it runs on your desktop and is vendor-specific, that's a shame but that's expected. If it runs in a browser and is vendor-specific, that's setting a bad precedent that we worked for years to overcome with IE6.

Of course, that's just my personal philosophy. Everyone is different.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: