The usual narrative is that capitalism and perfect competition are synonyms. No one is a monopoly. Firms compete and profits are competed away. But that’s a curious narrative. A better one frames capitalism and perfect competition as opposites; capitalism is about the accumulation of capital, whereas the world of perfect competition is one in which you can’t make any money. Why people tend to view capitalism and perfect competition as interchangeable is thus an interesting question that’s worth exploring from several different angles.
yeah, that's not saying competition hurts capitalism. Its saying avoiding competition is more profitable for the individual or company. We already knew that.
The fact that competition exists makes us try for unique offerings that fill unmet needs better than the existing offerings and avoid direct competition.
That's not saying "competition hurts capitalism", as originally asserted.
I don't think he did. If I remember correctly, he said you - as an individual entrepreneur - should seek out markets where you will not have to compete.
