Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

In-memory DBs were always a dead-end waste of time. There will always be bigger slower cheaper secondary storage, no matter how cheap main memory gets. And workloads always grow to exceed the available main memory (unless a system is dying). And secondary storage will always be paged, because it's too inefficient to address it at smaller granularity. That's just reality, and anyone who ignores reality isn't going to get very far.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: