No, it is not reasonable to constantly spread propaganda labelling Musk and Trump pedophiles and then act like the site wasn't filled with far left propaganda while talking about how bad X is.
Sometimes, when there is conflict, it helps to ask questions to better understand people. In furtherance of that shared understanding, here are some questions you were asked:
> Are Epstein and his associates pedophiles? [0]
> Are minorities allowed to exercise the second amendment rights the right champions for themselves? [1]
> Is it unfair to call someone cosplaying for a social media account that regularly posts repurposed Nazi slogans a Nazi? [2]
1: Only 20% of americans believe there should or should not be a law that would ban the possession of handguns, except by the police and other authorized persons - https://news.gallup.com/poll/1645/guns.aspx
Sometimes, it is crucial to differentiate a wall of loaded premises from an actual question before you move on to quoting a survey about whether Americans like Hitler.
It seems you might seek a back-and-forth argument where you simply talk past your interlocutor. In my experience, that doesn't lead to understanding. Are you sure you don't want to seek understanding?
We're in a polarized environment, and understanding is the best way to get past that, whereas dismissing* people with which you disagree tends to increase it.
* – from you in this thread so far: dismissing questions as "loaded"; dismissing 3 questions across 3 lines as "a wall"; dismissing differing opinions as "propaganda"; dismissing differing opinions as "extremist"; dismissing differing opinions as "far left"; dismissing differing opinions as "yapping"; dismissing differing opinions as "unreasonable"; etc.
