And MUSL's explicit policy of "do not implement essential features, just because... | Hacker News

Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit

		o11c 7 months ago \| parent \| context \| favorite \| on: RIP pthread_cancel And MUSL's explicit policy of "do not implement essential features, just because the standards are falling behind" is a major reason why many programs choose to never support building against MUSL.

pjz 7 months ago [–]

Funny, I see it as them choosing not to add another de-facto 'standard' ala https://xkcd.com/927/ .

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact