Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

This reminds me of one of my favourite exchanges in a detective story:

'Dear me!' said Miss de Vine, 'who is that very uninspired young woman? She seems very much annoyed with my review of Mr. Winterlake's book on Essex. She seems to think I ought to have torn the poor man to pieces because of a trifling error of a few months made in dealing, quite incidentally, with the early history of the Bacon family. She attaches no importance to the fact that the book is the most illuminating and scholarly handling to date of the interactions of two most enigmatic characters.'

'Bacon family history is her subject,' said Miss Lydgate, 'so I've no doubt she feels strongly about it.'

'It's a great mistake to see one's own subject out of proportion to its background. The error should be corrected, of course; I did correct it--in a private letter to the author, which is the proper medium for trifling corrections. But the man has, I feel sure, got hold of the master-key to the situation between those two men, and in so doing he has got hold of a fact of genuine importance.'

-- Gaudy Night, D.L.Sayers (1935)

I think comment sections tend to bring out the "feels strongly" responses where the "private letter" ones would be more appropriate.

While Gaudy Night is a detective story, it's just as much a love letter to Oxford academia (the author being an alumni).



Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: