Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

Really? 16 weeks of salary, or 4 months of pay. In my country, you get 3 months of pay as standard when you're fired from your job. Doesn't seem that great to me to be honest.


In the US, the minimum required is usually zero. The most I ever got was 4 weeks.


The minimum needed in the US for this situation is 60 calendar days [1]. Hence the 16 weeks.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Worker_Adjustment_and_Retraini...


16 x 7 = 112 days, I’m not sure I understand your comment? Even if it was business days only, 5 x 16 = 80 which is still above the minimum needed.


The WARN Act doesn't mandate severance payments AFAIK.


I think perhaps that's why poster used "for this situation" -- if a company doesn't want to have to provide advance notice, their only option with WARN is to do it with this kind of severance payment. Not sure if it was intended but that's a pretty cool outcome of the law.


US salaries are quite a lot more; lifestyle creep is a thing but at least for developers they get paid a lot more than the average worker in the US than say in the Europe. Factoring that, 4 months is amazing.


Do you earn SF salaries in your country?


They probably don't have SF housing costs in their country.


In big tech in the US, 4 months is usually enough to find another similar job in the industry. Also in the US for mass layoffs at big firms, the minimum is effectively 2 months because you are required by law to give 2 months notice to workers about such layoffs, 2 months severance is a way to not have to give such notice.


In this market, 4 months definitely isn't enough to find a similar job.


But are you not expected to work those 3 months? 4 months of pay without work is decent, but not amazing.


> But are you not expected to work those 3 months?

When you are leaving on your own term yes.

When you are laid off you are technically still an employee for those 3 months but nowadays many companies will just tell you to not show up for security reason.


It sounds like it's 25% better than what you get in your country?


Personally, I'd consider this nothing to write home about. It's OK. Not great, not terrible.

If we're laying off 20% of the company, I'd expect the package to be somewhere in the 6-12 months range. To me, that would seem more fair, considering they are completely restructuring the whole company.


I'd rather take having a tech industry at all and the 2-4X bigger US salaries (and 30% lower average taxes) than having my fellow citizens shoulder the burden of giving me 6-12 months of daycare.

In the US luckily the job market is still quite dynamic (and extremely tight by historical standards) so only in an extreme scenario would someone with Dropbox on their resume need 12 months to find another job.

They might have to take a pay cut from a 99th percentile salary to a 96th percentile salary though. Rough, I know.


Yeah, nothing to write home about until they pay inflation adjust salary till retirement age of 67 for all laid off employees.


“25% better than legally required minimum” is not generally considered “great” in many circumstances.


Comparison is the thief of joy. In the US, any amount is... infinity %? Undefined %? better than the legally required minimum of 0.


33%




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: