Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

In the wild, I primarily have seen graphql implemented instead of, or perhaps next to, REST. Not on top of REST.

I'm not sure what you mean about a poor man's SQL. Whether it's backed by micro-services via REST, or just a graphql API in a single app, the value prop for frontend<>backend communication is the same. It's not "using graphql wrong" to not have a micro service architecture.



Using it as a poor man’s SQL was addressed, but using it that way doesn’t mean that’s what it is for.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: