LLMs are the most advanced AI so far, so not sure what you mean.
> software is just tools that therefore cannot be intelligent
That's clearly the case for all other software, i.e. Word, web apps, games. Sure we can call AI "intelligent", but I'm pointing out a semantic difference that is convenient for the marketing but also misleading for the average person. If we're strict about what "intelligence" means, then we can clearly and obviously see that there is no such thing as a piece of software that you can interact with as if it were another person, that undrestands the world, models the world, models the mind of other people and its own mind. Current AI is intelligent in the way that smart phones are smart. That said, I'm not saying it's impossible, but rather that generative AI, while complicated, is still a deterministic black box, and not a sentient, dynamic mind.
> software is just tools that therefore cannot be intelligent
That's clearly the case for all other software, i.e. Word, web apps, games. Sure we can call AI "intelligent", but I'm pointing out a semantic difference that is convenient for the marketing but also misleading for the average person. If we're strict about what "intelligence" means, then we can clearly and obviously see that there is no such thing as a piece of software that you can interact with as if it were another person, that undrestands the world, models the world, models the mind of other people and its own mind. Current AI is intelligent in the way that smart phones are smart. That said, I'm not saying it's impossible, but rather that generative AI, while complicated, is still a deterministic black box, and not a sentient, dynamic mind.