I see a contradiction in your message here. On the one hand you're saying people are worse off because of technology, but then you're also saying that people don't rely on each other because they have more of their needs met. So which is it?
Wouldn't the poverty rebuild these communities ? I mean the hardships make people rely on each other right?
I don't entirely doubt what you're saying either, but I'm not so sure I see what you see.
There is no contradiction, because I do not believe that having all your physical needs met is necessarily the best end for a human being, especially if they have the capability to meet a lot of those needs themselves if they were given the tools to do so. It's like those people in the Matrix pods: they have their needs met, but they are being plugged into a machine and are not truly human.
Name a single instance or person who has all their physical needs met by an LLM?
Seriously, we're a long way off technological utopia. Even if we had some type of AGI/ASI that was self-aware like in movies ,there's little if any evidence to suggest it will just work for us and make sure you're ok.
Wouldn't the poverty rebuild these communities ? I mean the hardships make people rely on each other right?
I don't entirely doubt what you're saying either, but I'm not so sure I see what you see.