The Planck length is the smallest meaningful length, as far as we know.
There's no risk here... your statement is a deliberate personal attack, there's no other way to put it. It's like stabbing someone, but stating that you're doing so at the risk of looking like your committing murder.
> The Planck length is the smallest meaningful length, as far as we know.
No, this is not correct. The smallest meaningful length we actually know about based on experimental data is about twenty orders of magnitude larger than the Planck length, i.e., about the size of an atomic nucleus. As I pointed out in response to your first post, your statement about the Planck length is a plausible speculation in quantum gravity, not a known fact.
There's no risk here... your statement is a deliberate personal attack, there's no other way to put it. It's like stabbing someone, but stating that you're doing so at the risk of looking like your committing murder.