Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin



The problem that the US has is that calories are too cheap. Look at the class demographics of obesity. It's pretty clear no one is starving.


blanket free lunch is disgustingly wasteful and a terrible solution for needy children. It is like buying a new car whenever you have a flat tire.

I can feed my own kids, I don't need them picking up an extra slice of pizza every day for fun and throwing milk and plates and disposable utensils in the garbage. Ask any lunch worker about the additional garbage and waste it generates.

The correct solution is to remove the barriers stopping children from getting free lunch- stop requiring parents to sign up for it. If a lunch aide feels like a kid needs food, they should be able to sign them up without anyone having to know about it or consent to it. Let the schools give kids in need double lunches if they want them and/or something to take home with them. Double down on the kids in need, don't force it on everyone.


There should never be any judgement regarding a child's financial situation during the school day.

The place where I grew up handled this in the best possible way: Every kid got a lunch if they went through the lunch line, without exception. The school system simply kept track of which students got a meal, and at the end of the month, they'd either mail a bill or it would be covered through the free lunch program.

Under this system, there was no opportunity for students or staff to pass judgement on students for their financial situation.


the issue here is that how is it determined who is eligible for the free lunch program after the fact? The parents are too negligent to sign up, their account goes into arrears and the kid ends up skipping the line out of fear getting punished for it. Parents have to sign up and too many don't give a crap


> and the kid ends up skipping the line out of fear getting punished for it.

No, as I said above, every kid got a lunch without exception. The record keeping was unidirectional. The lunch line tallied the quantity of lunches that were handed out to each student and reported this to the district, but the district did not report back anything about paying bills to anyone at the school. Nobody in the lunch room knew anything about the finances of any student. They were tasked only with handing out lunches.

> Parents have to sign up and too many don't give a crap

This is better to make a problem of the district's finance department, not the individual school. They can solve this by mailing bills to parents and/or information about signing up for lunch programs. This is not a problem to solve by holding a child's lunch hostage.


I’m often shocked at what my kids are able to choose (as elementary students, much worse for middle school) when buying cafeteria lunch. Admittedly I went to a small parochial school, but when we bought “hot lunch” we were given a pre-determined, food pyramid compliant assortment and are only choice was chocolate or plain milk. And you were done when your tray was empty, or recess was over. There was very little waste from cafeteria meals.

Now my middle schooler will choose two cookies and a juice and the lunch attendant doesn’t bay an eye. Any retroactive punishment is long after he’s enjoyed his food treats or diabetes in early adulthood.


Are there any stats/citations that back up your assertion that kids who bring their own lunches in universal free lunch states are wasting food en masse?

> a terrible solution for needy children

The kids who previously weren't getting fed are now getting fed, aren't they?


The tire got replaced too. Who cares if we are killing the environment because of lazy policymakers right?


I don't understand what you're saying here.


> a lunch aide feels like a kid needs food

Giving random overworked, often bigoted people the power to let a kid eat or not? What could possibly go wrong?!




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: