Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

> moved to runtime

So a completely different scenario? Let's assume for a moment that developers only ever 'build' or 'check' their code, but all actual runtime behavior is in production. In production we have toooooons of security tooling for monitoring and constraining program behavior. On dev computers? Basically nothing.

Of course, developers run `test` as well, and sometimes they run the whole program but these use cases, especially at companies, are increasingly moving to CI.



Not running your tests locally to make sure stuff actually compiles/works before commiting to the repo and blowing up everyone else is a great way to piss off your QA group.

Please, make sure it runs locally first. CI often costs $$$, and when you nab a QA for debugging support, nothing irritates more than the answer "Well, no..." to the question "Did you even compile/run this?"


> Not running your tests locally to make sure stuff actually compiles/works before commiting to the repo and blowing up everyone else is a great way to piss off your QA group.

Uh... branches? Obviously?




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: