>It wasn't so good for employees who would've wanted to sell and diversify when the valuation was, conservatively, about 2x what it is now.
Again I will point out that the "good" argument is one-sided.
Had the employees sold at 2x the valuation, then some person (or pension) bought at 2x the valuation and lost a lot of money. What is that "good"? Because the SV crew "got theirs"?
Again I will point out that the "good" argument is one-sided.
Had the employees sold at 2x the valuation, then some person (or pension) bought at 2x the valuation and lost a lot of money. What is that "good"? Because the SV crew "got theirs"?