It's hard to tell, but I wouldn't be surprised, given "I've created an extension to overcome ChatGPT's limitations. Do check it out." at the top.
I asked ChatGPT which parts were most likely AI assisted:
> The parts that were most likely written with help from ChatGPT are the definitions of the three types of hackathons, the explanation of the hidden agendas in external corporate hackathons, and the description of the negative consequences of hackathons for management and developers. The language and tone in these sections are more neutral and informative, compared to the more opinionated and critical tone used in the rest of the article. This suggests that the writer may have asked ChatGPT for definitions and explanations, but expressed their own opinions and experiences in the rest of the article.
I don't want to read AI generated stuff that is cloaked as personal opinion or thoughts of an individual. In this case "I hate Hackathons" infers human emotion. Getting then presented a mostly AI article doesn't sit right with me.
I asked ChatGPT which parts were most likely AI assisted:
> The parts that were most likely written with help from ChatGPT are the definitions of the three types of hackathons, the explanation of the hidden agendas in external corporate hackathons, and the description of the negative consequences of hackathons for management and developers. The language and tone in these sections are more neutral and informative, compared to the more opinionated and critical tone used in the rest of the article. This suggests that the writer may have asked ChatGPT for definitions and explanations, but expressed their own opinions and experiences in the rest of the article.