If we're to argue that citizens could allocate up to $50 spread between candidat...

		eftpotrm on Dec 16, 2011 \| parent \| context \| favorite \| on: The nightmarish SOPA hearings If we're to argue that citizens could allocate up to $50 spread between candidates in any election in which they are eligible to vote, and that shall be the only permitted funding, what's the point in having votes at all; have we not just defined a preferential voting system?