Too many courts to court. It's why I advocate the US return to the ratio of representatives originally defined in the constitution; harder to bribe ~13,000 representatives than 435.
>harder to bribe ~13,000 representatives than 435
If you're a multibillionaire, not really. And you really just need certain committees and committee heads.
I think they're pointing out XX,000 representatives still doesn't matter if only X00 have functional control over $trillions of budget allocations.
Probably need such a broad dispersion and decentralization that you approach a rough high-level facsimile of a UBI before you really blunt the influence your parent post was pointing out.
