My first Mac was the first Intel iMac. OSX Tiger was better than Windows XP. Expose felt better than the alt tab of xp- and more fun. And Tiger pushed to have windows take up the space of their contents rather than the whole screen, so most windows were visible on screen all the time making switching between them easier.
In the time since, I brought another iMac and had 2 work MBPs.
In that time, MacOS got worse. It now wants to make windows full screen. Mission control is awkward if you use an ordinary mouse.
My workflow has changed. I'm more likely to have 2 windows of every app- 2 vscode windows, 2 terminal windows and 2 browser windows. As stated many times over, MacOS handles switching between those configuration of windows badly (and I gave it plenty of time to become intuitive).
I now use the Gnome desktop. I have windows that snap. I have alt tab that cycles through windows (it needs configuring). And it has an Expose like effect (gnome overview).
I feel like I have the best of all worlds.
Great window management.
Great hardware support (none of the MBPs supported daisy chaining my displays).
The Linux command line.
The same apps I'd be using on any other OS.
In the time since, I brought another iMac and had 2 work MBPs.
In that time, MacOS got worse. It now wants to make windows full screen. Mission control is awkward if you use an ordinary mouse.
My workflow has changed. I'm more likely to have 2 windows of every app- 2 vscode windows, 2 terminal windows and 2 browser windows. As stated many times over, MacOS handles switching between those configuration of windows badly (and I gave it plenty of time to become intuitive).
I now use the Gnome desktop. I have windows that snap. I have alt tab that cycles through windows (it needs configuring). And it has an Expose like effect (gnome overview).
I feel like I have the best of all worlds. Great window management. Great hardware support (none of the MBPs supported daisy chaining my displays). The Linux command line. The same apps I'd be using on any other OS.