“ An affirmative defense in which a defendant alleges that police officers acquired the evidence necessary to commence a criminal prosecution of the defendant by inducing the defendant to engage in a criminal act which the defendant would not otherwise have committed.”
Of course, the debate is “not otherwise committed” but hypotheticals are not a basis for “beyond reasonable doubt.”
Entrapment is:
“ An affirmative defense in which a defendant alleges that police officers acquired the evidence necessary to commence a criminal prosecution of the defendant by inducing the defendant to engage in a criminal act which the defendant would not otherwise have committed.”
Of course, the debate is “not otherwise committed” but hypotheticals are not a basis for “beyond reasonable doubt.”