Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

There is a size where on prem would be much cheaper on paper, but internal red tape for access to internal resources is such that teams are unnecessarily slowed down. For example I once worked at a place where it took several months to get an additional on-prem box to speed up our CI pipeline. Of course you can also add that amount of red tape to a cloud solution, but in my experience it's easier to get approval for an additional EC2 box.


We used to have an internal (and external) cloudfoundry instance. That was pretty nice as far as on-prem deployment options.

It’s just a shame they were permanently out of database servers with SSD storage, and for some reason couldn’t provision more for over a year.


Yes, this is the awkward phase of on-prem. Some companies stay there forever. Good companies will continue innovating and treat the time to resolution of your request as a KPI to reduce down to days, minutes, or even seconds.


On-prem and AWS/GCS/Azure aren't the only options.

There are smaller cloud providers, rented VMs, rented dedicated servers and rented colocation space.


For larger companies, frequently they are. You need to use already approved vendors.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: