Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

This wasn't a trivial technicality. They said users' phone numbers were being anonymized and they weren't.

How they handle private data, especially if they lie about what they're doing, does really matter. End-to-end encryption doesn't mean anything if they secretly keep the a key able to decrypt it, which is basically what they were getting fined for.



I'd argue it is because it's buried in some policy text that no user ends up reading anyway.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: