> it’s probably because those are prime child rearing years and that effort is needed to raise children. Instead Goldman Sachs gets those years.
Few people are responsibly having kids in their early twenties. Goldman got the time, but their alumni got the cash and cachet.
Not defending the practices in the complaint. 90+ hours is excessive. I turned down that lifestyle and think I’ve done decently well for myself. But being dismissive about the power, wealth and material comforts that work opens one up to is ignoring a strong signalling mechanism in our society.
Few people are responsibly having kids in their early twenties. Goldman got the time, but their alumni got the cash and cachet.
Not defending the practices in the complaint. 90+ hours is excessive. I turned down that lifestyle and think I’ve done decently well for myself. But being dismissive about the power, wealth and material comforts that work opens one up to is ignoring a strong signalling mechanism in our society.