I stand corrected. So what happen if a major bug is found late in the process ? I suppose either the feature is dropped for this release or the release delayed until the bug is fixed and the feature is kept. Do you know which is it ?
There isn't a hard policy; it'd be a case-by-case decision. If there wasn't rough consensus, it'd be up to the release manager and technical board to decide. So far, this hasn't really happened: there have been a few bugs that have delayed releases by, like, a few days or a week, but nothing so severe that has seemed to warrant pulling a feature down.
The power of Django (imho) is in how you can define data models only once, and out of them get excellent database migrations, database operations, form validation, API serialization/deserialization, and an admin interface. Is there anything in Node.js land that comes even close to this level of integration?
Last time I worked on a Node app, I had to define the data model once for the ORM (Objection), again when writing migrations by hand (Knex), again when defining the input validation schema (Joi), maybe again when defining data objects, and I didn't even have an admin.
For me, the language is secondary -- there were times when I would have liked to have a Django.js, so I could share code (validation and calculation modules) between backend and frontend.
I agree.
I've switched over to the Jamstack, and life is much easier.
If I need something fast and easy, I use the AWS amplify pretty heavily, and their new admin UI has been very useful for me.
Maybe 5 years ago. I code python for living, and I've found modern javascript to be pretty pleasant these days, and imo I prefer async in javascript than python.
It's nice to see Django being awesome and actively developed, but it feels like Django is losing touch.
The world has moved on to concurrency and Django, as a framework, seems ill-suited to meet future requirements.