while im not a lawyer, that does sound extremely far fetched.
you're also allowed to publish code with an MIT licence which can only be used with a 100% proprietary binary blob which can only be acquired by paying a third party.
the specified licence only applies to the published code after all.
said code might be useless without a licence to use that binary blob, but that has no meaning wrt the published open source code.
you're also allowed to publish code with an MIT licence which can only be used with a 100% proprietary binary blob which can only be acquired by paying a third party. the specified licence only applies to the published code after all.
said code might be useless without a licence to use that binary blob, but that has no meaning wrt the published open source code.