I see your point. But if they get the claimed several hundred times the productivity, then they need several hundred times less land. That land is still several thousand dollars an acre, even out in the sticks. That's a lot of money that can be saved on the land.
> Right now we have excess food production.
True. If this vertical approach produces wheat for less money, then it will take over. If not, then it won't... today. There's this whole climate change thing. People suspect that it's going to harm food production. Can we control this smaller environment well enough for it to still be productive? Better than we can control outdoor farms.
> Right now we have excess food production.
True. If this vertical approach produces wheat for less money, then it will take over. If not, then it won't... today. There's this whole climate change thing. People suspect that it's going to harm food production. Can we control this smaller environment well enough for it to still be productive? Better than we can control outdoor farms.