>Was it later revealed who the targeted demographic was?
It is speculation based on list of targeted apps (listed in implant teardown post)
>I guess what it is actually supposed to say is that the exploits were developed over the course of two years; not that they were actively used for two years.
I don't know what evidence Apple has, but Google definitely meant that it was exploited for two years: (from exploit chain 1 post)
>This exploit provides evidence that these exploit chains were likely written contemporaneously with their supported iOS versions; that is, the exploit techniques which were used suggest that this exploit was written around the time of iOS 10. This suggests that this group had a capability against a fully patched iPhone for at least two years.
It is speculation based on list of targeted apps (listed in implant teardown post)
>I guess what it is actually supposed to say is that the exploits were developed over the course of two years; not that they were actively used for two years.
I don't know what evidence Apple has, but Google definitely meant that it was exploited for two years: (from exploit chain 1 post)
>This exploit provides evidence that these exploit chains were likely written contemporaneously with their supported iOS versions; that is, the exploit techniques which were used suggest that this exploit was written around the time of iOS 10. This suggests that this group had a capability against a fully patched iPhone for at least two years.