Max-Pooling a 1024-cell output LSTM will result in a 1024-sized vector.
Looking at the code for the Encoder (https://github.com/facebookresearch/LASER/blob/fec5c7d63daa2...), each LSTM has the same amount of hidden cells. (although the default parameters of that class don't quite match the ones used in the post; so I assume it's 512x2x5).
Yes but they're not maxpooling in the last dimension.
They're max pooling over the sequence length [0], (the other way doesn't really make sense in this context).
The output size is 1024, the hidden vector size is 512 but they're using bidirectional LSTMs which concatenates the outputs of each direction -- so the total is 1024 [1].
Looking at the code for the Encoder (https://github.com/facebookresearch/LASER/blob/fec5c7d63daa2...), each LSTM has the same amount of hidden cells. (although the default parameters of that class don't quite match the ones used in the post; so I assume it's 512x2x5).