Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

It costs them a lot less per kg to lift to orbit, maybe they're just throwing more panel area at the problem? They're claiming 22.8% efficiency for their earthbound panels so that's only a ~50% increase in panel weight.


More panels means more atmospheric drag in LEO. This leads to a shorter lifespan of the satellite.


Maybe they're equipping them all with EM drives? :P


I believe efficiency is the smallest of problems with sending stuff into space




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: