Oh man, I emailed the creators a year ago when they first released the site, encouraging them to make the frontend open source so the performance and layout issues could be fixed by the community (including myself, there are some easy bug fixes I wanted to submit). Back then, they were still deciding what the direction was going to be for the library. A year later, it seems they've opted for the closed-source, no improvements path unfortunately.
I still subscribe, since the papers are interesting, but the website needs some love.
I still subscribe, since the papers are interesting, but the website needs some love.