Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | zrail's commentslogin

Would you be willing to quantify what "mild" means to you, maybe in terms of a USDA zone? There are maps for both US and Europe:

https://planthardiness.ars.usda.gov/pages/map-downloads

https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:USDA_hardiness_zones...


Passive house standards first gained popularity in Germany and Scandinavia but it seems the principles have been adapted to quite a wide range of climate zones now.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Passive_house


You already can with nRF52 boards. Presumably they'll add ESP32 support soon too.

https://esphome.io/components/zigbee/


The headscale API is very different than the Tailscale API so if you're automating setting up clients it's not quite drop in. Once a client is up, though, from what I've heard it's seamless.

I think this is mostly a Wireguard thing and not specifically a Tailscale thing. Wireguard does what they call "cryptokey routing" where if you prove you possess a key that the other peer knows, you get the traffic (subject to firewall, allowed IPs list, etc etc). Wireguard stores the most recent address:port that it heard from a particular cryptokey on, but it natively lets peers roam, as long as only one roams at a time.

From what I can tell you're pretty much right. A linux bridge cannot possibly be as efficient or speedy as a dedicated switch asic. OpenWRT has support for a few different hardware switch kernel APIs, but you can't exactly buy one of those on a PCIe card and I've never seen one of those N100-class boards with one instead of a set of i226 ethernet controllers taking most of the PCIe lanes.

Mikrotik sells the CCR2004-1G-2XS-PCIe, which is a fascinating device:

https://mikrotik.com/product/ccr2004_1g_2xs_pcie

It is a full Mikrotik router stripped down to just a board and hung off a PCIe interface. Iirc by default it exposes a virtual gigabit interface to the host and otherwise acts exactly like a CCR2004 running RouterOS.

Doesn't really buy you anything vs a RB5009 unless you can use the pair of 25Gbps ports, but it sure is neat.


(not a lawyer) I _think_ this is a result of Trump v CASA, where the Supreme Court determined that preliminary injunctions and TROs without a bond of some sort (which until then were fairly common) were invalid and unenforceable.

It's baffling, to be honest. I'm at a fintech that is currently pushing very hard at this, but in the same breath talking about how we're not a pure software play. I just don't understand where they're coming from.


irrational exuberance


Looks pretty interesting!

Tiny note: there's a typo in your repo description.


nooo! lol but thanks, I'll go hunt it down.


It's a Show HN. That's the point.


Yes.


Suffering from success.


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: