Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | spiffistan's commentslogin

Incidentally GSM-R problems led to a nationwide train service shutdown in Norway on December 25. Related?


It was said the fact of a shutdown was not a huge exception in Norway, it had happened before. The fact that they couldn't just restart was. Just what I read.


twitter 2.0


There was a controversy when Go came out about the naming due to another language also being called Go, and the top voted alternative name was Plan9, and as an homage they may have used that internally instead.


The top voted alternative was "Issue 9" which served as a reference to Plan 9 and happened to be the actual issue number in the Go project on Google Code opened by the guy who's programming language (named "Go!") was already out there.


You're right, my bad


A coating for projectiles to be able to withstand the heat from laser weapons would be one with possibly significant impact, given recent announcements.


It probably does work for certain kinds of software, but groundbreaking research breakthroughs not so much.


Twitter has been rebranded as 'X'. Elon has the domain x.com and I suppose he wants to use it


Is this like when that Roman emperor named his horse as a senator, or are we not quite there yet?


The most sane interpretation is that Elon Musk was payed to dilute or destroy Twitter. I can't think of anything else that would make sense.

Throwing 44 billion dollars on a company and then gutting it for everything that was valuable including a unique brand that had even its own verb?

But the sad reality is probably that a 12 years old narcissist edgelord in the body of a billionaire wanted a vanity plate.


The initially-too-high offer plus downturn in his stock value right after, meant a deal structure that damn-near doomed the company anyway (tons of debt).

Best-case (for him), Twitter as we knew it dies and he manages to turn the burnt-down ashes into something profitable enough to overcome that hurdle. Twitter per se cannot reasonably get out of the hole he's dug for it.

Though, arguably, the brand itself was a huge part of the value, and he just threw that in the trash.

You know a guy's going down a weird path when all defenses of his behavior amount to "I know the last twenty things he's done have looked insane and none of it's made any money, but he's got a secret genius plan, I swear! 5D chess!"


Seems like a reasonable theory if it's the price to be paid by those in power to avoid future revolutions.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Twitter_Revolution


Or to foment one of his own ;)


This would explain things, if there was a credible suggestion for who's pulling the strings.

The theory of Elop destroying Nokia (consumer) makes sense, because he was at Microsoft, went to Nokia sold it to Microsoft at diminished value and stayed there for a good amount of time. But who would pay Musk for this? And how will he be compensated? Afaik, he's lighting a bunch of his own money on fire. Although, there has been a lot less news from him on Tesla and SpaceX, so maybe it was all a plan to keep him out of those spaces.


I've seen theories about Saudis paying for this in order to prevent the next Arab Spring, in which Twitter played a key role for the protesters to organize themselves. Seems a bit far-fetched, but these days, who knows?


The US is already there, with an almost brain-dead 90-year old Senator being as good as gone, so that a privately-owned company doing whatever its largest owner thinks fit for the good of the company going forward doesn't even get close to that.


That's one of the most jargon-dense sentences I've ever read


I know! The first time I read it I was like oh OK and then I reread it and I was like yup I don’t understand any of it.


It is scientific jargon, yes, though, hm, I would expect any high schooler if not even lower could make at least some sense out of a "spin period" (if not knowing earth rotates, everybody knows a spinner), magnetic field strength (again, compass), age (...)? Luminosity? Also at least the units seconds, years should be known, Gauss is also high school knowledge and straightforward to infer from magnetic.. that this is about some object in space if astronomers observed it is also crystal clear.

That's at least half of the sentence :), expectations much too high?


I’ll do you one better with less than half your verbiage. I understood all the following words (so, gasp, I lied!):

> Discovered in 2018, PSR J0026–1955 is a Galactic pulsar with a … of approximately 1.306 seconds and … measure of…. It has a … luminosity of …surface magnetic field strength of 770 billion …, and its … age is estimated to be some 47 million years.


I hate modern day exaggerations and maybe, gasp, wanted to say also that (and be happily downvoted for that again :)).

And I also don't believe you about spin period or Gauss.. lol.


Try reading a modern AI/machuine learning paper


Was about to say this. Kudos to them for actually conveying the information! They seem to have learned that what they're (partially) in the business of selling is long term trust.


Considering continental drift is about 2.5cm per year (or one inch)...about 50km from where it is today.


Is there consensus that continental drift has been constant? What if it was much faster at the beginning and has slowed with time?

In that case it would be hard to know its location 2 million years ago.


If continental drift were off by a factor of 10, it would be 500km from where it is now.

And given that Greenland is about ~2500km long North-South, even if it drifted Northward the whole time, it’d still be mostly in the Arctic circle.


But SF is also very chilly for California so it really helps with the perception of humidity.


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: