Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | sneystein's commentslogin

It usually isn't implemented in hardware, but in firmware(software) on the storage device. It's still just as messy, but now no one can fix it.


I feel until you have atleast a clusterful of services, you shouldn't add that much complexity to your applications. It's much easier to manage a single tower for as long as possible, and slowly migrate to a new one when it seems ripe


For some reason nytimes doesen't want you to read them in incognito mode. Luckily they simply hide the article afterwards with JavaScript, and can be read without it


The reason is that they don't want you to circumvent the free article limit.



slick! do you know how can i search ipfs?


https://www.ipse.io/ is one of the various IPFS search engines - but it doesn't look like it's indexed this article yet...


Part of the reason might be that the malware was designed to be benign and not use all available resources


> benign

For the computers running on renewable power (Costa Rica, maybe?), it would truly be benign and not just stealthy. Long live green PoW!


The effects of electric battry density is cumulative. A lot of the requirements come from hauling the battery. If the battery gets smaller, you also need a lot less energy


Yes that too, lower battery weight means the rest of the aircraft can be made lighter. It's been a long time since I've seen numbers but the effect is more significant than people would naively assume. As you increase the weight of component you need to also increase the wing area and the required power. Which itself adds weight.


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: