What was the business? Stripe's not really making the rules here, it's the financial partners backing them. Just because something is "legal" doesn't mean it's not risky.
As an easy example, from the page you linked, "psychic services" are banned.
Pharmacies exchanging prescription drugs. Regulated, not risky - don't confound the two.
And there are no "rules" restricting these transactions over the ACH network, Stripe is applying the widest scope of restrictions gathered from across of its partners, which include the credit card processors.
And I was asking this question to the Stripe PM, not some uninformed white knight.
Since it's relevant to the topic conversation, only use a Roku if you're blocking its outgoing requests. It sends out an insane amount of outbound data that goes beyond just your viewing habits (e.g. wifi name, "connection data") [1].
Installing pi-hole reveals how noisy a Roku is [2].
True, but the point of Inbox was to treat your email like a todo list. By definition, it is the same, but training millions of Inbox users that this is new behavior makes it hard to grok.
> If you're using bundles, that's the one big feature that isn't ported, but it doesn't immidiately sound like you are.
Every Inbox is probably using bundles whether they remember or not. It becomes incredibly powerful when you have a trip coming up and your flight, hotel, rental car, etc. is all bundled up together.
For everyone mentioning Ross hiring hit men to kill people. He was never charged with that. Prosecutors commonly fabricate a story to paint a picture of a defendant for the jury. We will never know for sure if Ross actually did this but he's innocent until proven guilty.
Thanks for that.
For those who want to read more, go to https://freeross.org/making-a-murderer/ (link to Ross's charges and Ross's indictment and more)
Ross's charges at trial were all NON-VIOLENT.
Regardless if it's convincing or not, he's not guilty of the crime.
Imagine this: you steal a bag of Oreos from a 7-11. You are sent to trial. Then the prosecution says you also killed some dude. When all is said and done, you are convicted of shoplifting and receive an insane amount of time in prison but were never actually charged with murder, wouldn't you think that the jury was manipulated?
No, I wouldn't. Because the jury has nothing to do with the sentencing. The prosecution also wouldn't just make up the story of killing some dude; there would be some evidence to link me to that action.
Stop pretending that Ulbricht is some kind of saint, and that there is no evidence of him doing this.
I don't disagree that there may be some kind of evidence to link to that action. But I do believe that evidence can be tampered with to create the illusion. Seriously, a chat transcript is what people cite as evidence? We as a society should doubt accusations until they've been proven to be factual.
There's been numerous cases of people being exonerated of a crime [1] after spending years of their life inside prison.
I'm not trying to pretend that Ulbricht is a saint. He deserves to be in prison for running an illegal market. But if that's all he was ever convicted of, then I believe that the punishment of a double life sentence doesn't fit the crime.
No, no, no, no, no. The chat transcripts were right there for everyone to see. If you're going to claim things were fabricated, you have to prove that.
Stuff You Should Know recently put out a podcast vaping [1] that provided some insight on the subject. The conclusion was that better than cigarettes slightly worse than doing nothing.
Hey, I got pretty excited when I heard of Strava's move to Denver since it's the one app I use nearly every day (and would love to work for). I'll be moving to Denver from Boulder later in the summer, can you comment as to whether you all will be in the Galvanize office for the foreseeable future or if you will be moving somewhere else? Thank you.
I'm still convinced that in the world of frontend development, Ember is the only framework that hasn't screwed over its users.
My guess is that at Facebook there's too many smart people with differing opinions. Hence, we have to do an insane amount of research to construct the grab bag of pulling things together. And once that grab bag is complete, Facebook says "here's the new cool way to do it".
Ember on the other hand has happily given you the grab bag and has helped you support your production happens with the most professional, enterprise release structure.
Disclosure: Used to do only frontend development with Ember but switched jobs and now use React/Ember
You are comparing a view library (react) with a full framework (ember).
Ofc you are supposed to pull things together with react, that's exactly what's intended.
Compared to react, ember is: slow (1), more difficult to learn (2), has a much smaller community (3) and, most important aspect to me, has a huge footprint (4).
(I'm not against ember, it might have some nice aspects and features. It was really nice during the time when they released 1.0. But today I just think their are better options available)
Good point! If you managed to capture all this information, it would theoretically be possible. However, being able to get this much control is essentially impossible. We emphasize "pseudorandom" because nothing is ever truly 100% random.
