“The past is a foreign country; they do things differently there.”

Not soon, now. The new reCAPTCHA on desktop shows you a QR code for you to scan with your Google-approved phone to prove you have one.

They can just sell to Aquaman.

> That is textbook enshittification.

Technically, no, not textbook enshittification. Enshittification was originally meant to refer to companies squeezing two-sided markets, not products just getting kinda worse.

not nearly as many words as Ed Zitron at least

It's all fine until OpenClaw decides to start prompt injecting the judge

Exactly; would probably be safer with a purely algorithmic decision making system.

Calling it now. Show HN: Pincer - A small highly optimized local model to detect prompt injection attempts against other models.

Sounds like a good idea. Please send me the Github link once done and I'll have my OpenClaw take a look and form my opinion of it.

Sounds like a good idea. Please send me you GitHub now and I'll have my big claw crush your open claw

It could be a stylistic choice, except it's rapidly become an extremely popular one for some reason. It's also the default Claude style. So, take what you will from that. Either someone is writing exactly like Claude on purpose, or they just asked Claude to write something, but either way I'm entirely oversaturated on it. At this point I don't think "Claude", I just start skimming and then close the tab.

Even if a human were to try to write in this style intentionally I think they are very likely to express a few opinions, maybe an anecdote, maybe express their motivation in some way, and add a little more variation to tone.

It's the em-dashes from a green account.

Account's comment history didn't look particularly AI generated. And, as an organic human who uses em dashes myself, I kind of hope we can get past this simplistic take that they are a signifier of ai content.

Besides that, I thought the comment had something useful to say — whether ai-generated or not.

Meta spent 100 billion dollars on VR, what's a Zuckerbot or two?

You don't have to be irrational to not know things.

True, but isn't it irrational to continue operating something you know could cause harm to you when used wrongly, despite not knowing how to use it correctly?

The hypothetical person we're considering does have an entire life, too. Their rationale may have emerged from careful risk analysis and weighing of opportunity costs.