Interesting project and approach. I would like to host the captures locally though, otherwise I'd risk potentially losing years of captures and other useful information that is works on PageStash only if PS goes under.

Not a fan of subscriptions either, but I guess hosting and LLM analysis is a recurrent cost to PS as well.

I don't care much for the knowledge graph. Pricing-wise, I see it more like $5/m considering that a number of capturing solutions exist (Zotero, SingleFile, Save to Epub etc.).

Totally agree on the storage. Just added an export option. I was thinking about local storage that in terms of choosing an archive folder but not totally sure what would be intuitive e.g. if you added markup/comments/notes in platform then you might want that before saving (rather than at point of capture).

Yeah, I need to strike a balance with the hard costs. Appreciate the feedback! It's difficult to get something up and running at those numbers (those guys have scale) but hoping I can tailor towards any niche use-cases in the interim because the established players do not release features fast.

Quite possible. In a way this is both sad and also entirely exciting.

I see: "404: The requested page could not be found. Are you sure the URL in the address bar is correct?"

Originally published here: https://aeon.co/essays/generative-ai-has-access-to-a-small-s...

Well worth a read.

>Our research reveals that trade may not always foster democracy and liberalise regimes.

This seems to be the consensus across the board.

News aside, surely you can see how the game is currently being dominated by the US and how Europe understands the current status - where the US is objectively a political antagoniser - as huge liability with potentially extreme consequences?

> those who have never been here or taken the time to interact with an American

I think there's a misunderstanding at play here; in the vast majority of cases Europeans see Americans as reliable, cool-headed, friendly people. What they take issue with is the US' imperialist, heavy-handed, ombelico-del-mondo approach.

I was going to say just that. The whole statement is ridiculous.

Current article title: "EU’s 'Chat Control' shifts again: Danish compromise advances to ambassadors, critics warn of "backdoor" scanning via risk rules"

> He further argues that the failure to diagnose the trend has led to a degradation in political discourse since left and right leaning actors blame the policies of "the other side" and "what I like to call the 'honest middle' cannot be heard above the din."

I disagree, there's no blaming on the other side since just one side has really been in charge and that side is comprised of both Dems & Republicans. Whilst I can understand that in the US some would deem Dems as a left-leaning actor - it has never been that. In effect, the US has always had a right-leaning government, oscillating further or closer from the centre.

Agree with the last point. Especially when you look at it from a global perspective. It reminds of a discussion that in a lot of Western European countries, the Democratic Party would be considered on the right.

I suggest that we've become accustomed to let the specialists to define and accaparate too much of the public realm of wellbeing, common good, justice etc. and too little in the hands of the subjects of these fields.