The example happens to use "munging" text, but I think the GP is trying to make the point that you can't use sed (effectively) to parse, for instance, a collection of database entries from an SQL server in the same way that LINQ would be able to do so.
The tl;dr I got from the article was LINQ is effective at working with sets of data; not just sets of text data from a text file.
True, although Plan9 pushed that part of the Unix philosophy even further, towards where it arguably handles some of those more general cases as well, with "structural regexes" that work on things other than collections of lines: http://doc.cat-v.org/bell_labs/structural_regexps/
Isn't the general consensus that regexes are hard to maintain and debug? I'm not sure that "structural regexes" are solving the right problem.
I think maybe we're not shooting at the same baskets though (basketball reference, apologies if you're not from US); I'm trying to write software applications, not shell scripts.
I'm sorry, but you're still missing the point. The point is that the syntax with LINQ is actually the same. Saying you have a program to do X in bash is the equivalent to saying you've got a library to do X in C# or Java.
LINQ, on the other hand, can work with arbitrary runtime objects and arbitrary backend implementations. Haskell's still cooler, though.
I am not sure if i would take back someone who is anyway planning to leave.Even if they do they will fire after they are sure you are redundant, that will mess up your visa status. Search and take up any job for the time being and keep looking.
We have a lot of decent developers on our team. But management is still stuck in 90's where everything is done as huge framework building waterfall exercise. The word YAGNI doesnt mean anything to anyone here.
So yea lot of skilled devs are writing useless frameworks when they could have producing real business value.
So I would say the most important thing is the process once you have a decently skilled team.
US still favors family based immigration system . So "highest" doest count in this context when compared to points ( skill) based system in other countries like UK.
Depends on how you look at it. With "family" based immigration, someone has basically vouched for your character. In the US, family means you are financially responsible for this person being let in this country. If they can't fend for themself, you shelter, clothe, and feed them. They are really serious about it and it requires you meet income, savings, and property thresholds.
The UK sort of has both, family and skills can get you in. Recently, they have started to de-emphasize the family visas.
With points, you are at the mercy of the market of the host country. The UK has, recently, restricted the high-tech industry in some areas, but hairdressers are still in demand under the points system. So someone with a BSc may actually be less qualified than someone that went to beautician's school under this scheme.
I always wondered how that works. For example, my great-grandmother from my father's side was born in Brooklyn. And then they have decided to return to Europe. I must be one of the few that has heritage reversed.