That's more to do with how you setup to trigger the commands.
Async here really means that it doesn't block with your typing, jumping around in the text editor if plugin starts doing some heavy work in the background due to some action that got triggered by whatever event you had setup for plugin to do. One of the plugin that I particularly remember was syntastic (I haven't kept up with it to know if they've fixed this or not) that would just create janks every now and then if the workload was heavy.
For the yesgraph link I had to disable ad-blocking and uBlock Origin and still only got a static image with a Twitter advertisement pasted over the image.
The graphistry link is similarly useless just showing a few sentences on a few pages ending in a "request demo" button.
Hi Ivan, always cool to see what Graphistry users are doing!
Phil, sad to hear you weren't able to see your Twin Graph. Many of us use ad blockers and this is the first report we've gotten like yours, so we'll dig in. Meanwhile, you may be able to try a direct link to my own YesGraph TwinMap: https://labs.graphistry.com/graph/graph.html?dataset=lmeyero... . (Note: best on laptops, and we recently relaunched with Falcor/React, so currently porting all our page load optimizations.)
For more information about graphistry, we have users piloting the three below layers of our stack. Because we can load 10-100X more data at the visual tier than other systems here (so 100K-1M+ things), people have been exploring connections across events/entities for some fascinating reasons:
* Investigation & Response -- Connect to systems like Splunk and get rich, scalable visual graph views and easy workflow automation. Ex: build an investigation template that takes an indicator of compromise and runs queries that connect it to various users, devices, alerts, etc. Or, "here are our ssh trails and anomalies around them."
* Exploration: Data scientists and data analysts will explore connections in their events or samples, e.g., for week-over-week model tuning, security research & forensics, & even now loan analysis. They'll load in a bunch of events or samples where each may have a lot of attributes (IPs, times, amounts, ...), and then they can see correlations. Ex: most false positives are from events with 3 particular combinations of characteristics, or an outage involved 4 distinct phases of behavior and entities.
* Developers: folks building internal apps for scenarios like the above.
For the latter two use cases, a good place to get started is our API: https://github.com/graphistry/pygraphistry . Feel free to contact us at info@ if this may solve a problem for you. (And.. we're hiring! Help us build web-based visual tools with GPUs acceleration to solve real data problems!)
This reminds me of a quote by Renier Knizia, the boardgame designer, about playing boardgames: "When playing a game, the goal is to win, but it is the goal that is important, not the winning".
You don't see a White People Museum because, in the US and Europe anyway, that is the default: they are all white people museums unless otherwise stated.
Well, yes, because those countries / continents are historically white. Just like an African museum would be "black people", since Africa is historically black.
And, okay, to really shut this one down, what would you say to a "White History Museum" in Africa? That's a real exception to your hypothesis!
There would not be a problem with a "White History Museum" if there was enough of an historical presence of white people in that place to support it. I don't know enough about the history of African countries to know if there is one that meets this criteria. The same could be said for any "non-default" minority "type" anywhere.
>if there was enough of an historical presence of white people in that place to support it.
Who has the authority to establish that threshold? Seems quite arbitrary and problematic. White History Museum in South Africa? What about Zambia? DRC? All have a white historical presence, and in places like Zimbabwe, an argument could be made that the culture has suffered a certain persecution (I am not taking a side on this argument here).
Biking against traffic (even in a bike lane) is a bad idea. It forces someone into traffic, either the guy going the wrong way or a bicyclist going the correct way. It surprises pedestrians jaywalking and it surprises cars pulling out of parking spots both of whom assume they only need to look one way. It's just a bad idea all around.
Not really no. You increase the chance that you'll kill yourself and someone else. Ride in the lanes and with traffic. Everyone is safer when everyone can anticipate what's going to happen. This is especially true in the chaos of NYC traffic.
As a pedestrian it's a horrible idea. I've almost been struck 5 times (and counting) by cyclists riding the wrong way down avenues. It's incredibly frustrating - and definitely gives me a very jaded view of cyclists and their respect for traffic rules.
this is the thing about cyclists is they are scarier than they are dangerous.
in a collision between a cyclist and a pedestrian there is an almost equal potential for harm for both the cyclist and the pedestrian. the rates of rapid deceleration are just as forceful as the rate of acceleration.
the pedestrian could potentially be struck with a metal part of the bike. an almost equal potential exists for the cyclist to be injured by a metal part of the bicycle hitting the ground or a parked car before the cyclist does.
So while i'm sure that your close encounter with a scofflaw
cyclist was scary, it was just as dangerous for you as it was for them.
That doesn't excuse the behavior. One is deciding to engage in it despite the danger the other is a passive unwilling participant. Or, to put it in auto terms, a reckless driver and other drivers have the roughly the same potential damage if a collision were to occur, but we definitely don't equate the reckless driver with the one who drives predictably.
It may be as dangerous to them as me, but I doubt they're considering that. And I'd rather not get hit by a bike; I was once, by a cyclist going at a decent clip and was lucky to leave with only minor injuries (if I'd fallen at a different angle my head would have hit the edge of a concrete stair.)
Some bike lanes in NYC have two lanes as well. I don't believe 1st Ave does though.
edit: I misunderstood. Yes, if the bike lane is contraflow of course use it that way. Everyone expects bikes from the "wrong way" in that situation. It's all about minimizing surprises to anyone in or near the street.
It minimizes left-hand turns across oncoming traffic that has a green light. i.e. it minimizes human judgement. If everyone stops at red lights (and people are very good at that), then there are fewer or no places where traffic crosses paths at the same time.
