> if the outcome is reliably and deterministically achieved
It's not. My favorite example: due to vibe coding overload literally nobody knows what configuration options OpenClaw now supports. (Not even other LLM's.)
Their "solution" is to build a chat bot LLM that will attempt to configure OpenClaw for you, and hope for the best, fingers crossed. Yes, really.
The openclaw situation is ridiculous. Configuring it is a nightmare, even with 3 different LLMs trying to help. Then I check their docs and it says three different things. Agents will take questions and turn them into a new config file, which consists of made up settings, causing the gateway to crash.
My setup is very simple too, just two agents, some MD files, and discord. Nothing else. These people using it for real work or managing their email and texts are in for a rough ride.
Have you seen the code generated by AI? These things converge on the "1 million lines to make an API call" pattern. They're a lot of things, but certainly not "micro".
Except, apparently, Anthropic - who are doing their darndest to get everyone onboard their tools as a moat. Apparently that's the only strategy to AI stickiness.
And their strategy kind of worked, right? CC is the most popular agentic coding tool. Anthropic faces competition from OpenAI (potentially better model, weaker TUI tool) and from the rest (potentially worse models, weaker TUIs). So their strategy is to develop both: make their closed model and closed tool better than competition so that when people want to vibceode they will choose their ecosystem.
reply