Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | ooterness's commentslogin

So you gave up everyone's privacy for no benefit at all?

You can't have privacy when out in public!! No-one's privacy was given up here because no-one here was engaging in private acts, since all of them were in the public.

The privacy of being in a parking lot, surrounded by a dozen other cameras from a myriad of businesses, in public?

Not sure, the point.

People generally aren't complaining about home owners mounting cameras for themselves (the car is no different). A 3rd party combining the interconnected nature of their system into a holistic system with sweeping coverage is much different than a single person figuring out who hit their car.


It would be nice for neighborhood cameras to timely alert neighbors when a porch pirate was on the prowl in their neighborhood. I get the privacy implications, but after having a few packages stolen one might just not care anymore.

Since police absolutely have no care about porch pirates where i live, I rig my camera to turn up a siren for 10 seconds (using a homekit power plug) when it sees someone near my townhome after 11PM (this is enough to usually scare them off to easier pickings). It wouldn't be so bad if the kids bedroom wasn't on the first floor and we are on the third, but it is what it is. At least its only really bad in late spring and summer, the only time when Seattle's long rainy season comes in useful.

Its too bad that I can't bike in Seattle anymore, the theft situation just makes it too unbearable (and probably why you see fewer people biking these days even though they are dumping lots of money into biking infrastructure). Think what we could do with cameras like we've done with apple tags to ramp down bike theft (then again, police don't care, and people aren't ready to go vigilante here).


Their insurance paid for the repairs to my car and a rental for the duration. Otherwise I would've had to go through my insurance ($1000 deductible) + possible rise in rates.

I don't think a Costco parking lot provides any reasonable expectation of privacy to be given up.

I think there should be more than one standard. "Reasonable expectation of privacy" is usually used to dismiss people's concerns about constant surveillance. Let's stop being complicit in public surveillance.

You do not have a reasonable expectation of privacy in a public space and it is absurd to suggest that people should/could.

Were you replying to someone else?

proper blame assignment is its own reward, at least the offending party's insurance rates increased (assuming they had insurance).

And their insurance paid for the whole repair and car rental. No deductible for me and my increase on my insurance.

admission is tough

Just wait until you go to a Walmart and they have a portable surveillance tower set up in the parking lot.

It took me a minute to realize that "Trekkers" in this headline is not referring to fans of Star Trek.


https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bielefeld_conspiracy

1. Do you know anybody from "J.P. Morgan Healthcare Conference"?

2. Have you ever been to "J.P. Morgan Healthcare Conference"?

3. Do you know anybody who has ever been to "J.P. Morgan Healthcare Conference"?


Spent new years in bielefeld. The place is so generic and forgettable I’m not surprised it was picked for the saying


I'm convinced JMPHC is all a conspiracy to get me to pay $1400/night for a room at the Kimpton the one week I need to visit SF for an unrelated reason


Remember Moab!


Sounds like a great plugin.


No, it really hasn't. Sweeping the problem under the rug has already resulted in at least 150 deaths, which could have been prevented by allowing pilots to seek mental health care.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Germanwings_Flight_9525


Also probably the 787 crashing in India this year and Malaysia Airlines Flight 370

Looking at the list of crashes >200 deaths since 2010, it seems to be about 50% pilot suicide.


150 deaths is statistically insignificant on this scenario and actual a very good evidence the current policy is working.

It is hard for some people to have the emotional maturity to understand this, but we can't fucking prevent every fucking death. We will all fucking die sooner or later, too.

You have absolutely no objective reason to suppose that changing this policy would have prevented this, not to mention the risk of making things worse.


People will always die, but almost all of them will die in ways that are PREVENTABLE.


But the paradox is, all of them will die and not all preventions are Pareto efficient.

I can keep an old decrepit rich guy living a miserable life for some more 6 months at the same cost that would take to me to improve the life expectancy of some 100 poor babies a few decades.

I can try save a bunch of fat very-sick boomers from a respiratory infection at the cost of causing an economic crisis that will completely fuck a lot of young people too for decades ahead. Was it fucking worth?


The amount of flying that people do is not constant; if lots of airplanes fall out of the sky and explode in fiery wrecks, people will fly less.

In this case, "lots" is "anything more than once a month" because footage of the above is addictive to anyone trying to make money from the news. Look at how many flights there are a day. How high can the crash rate be until those pictures are seared into our eyeballs?

It's actually funny you bring up COVID, because I agree with you that the restrictions were... not good. I also think that the FAA could use a lighter touch on just about everything, EXCEPT the level of safety it requires from Part 121 operators.


The question is which ones are preventable in advance without causing other deaths.


Actually, ProtonDB indicates Crysis runs just fine on Linux.

https://www.protondb.com/app/17300


I have never gotten it to run on Linux, even with tweaks. However I gave up years ago so maybe I should give it a go and see if anything changed.


It depends on the cat. Some will self-regulate, others will not.


> passed some level of authorised audit in order to be able to store government ID cards.

In a perfect world, maybe. Not in this one.


It's so the billions of disgruntled former workers can't storm the castle.


Still doesn't make sense. The PLA (largest army in the world) can't even capture Taiwan. If they wanted an impenetrable fortress a random island is all they need.


That's one of the most wrong statements I've seen on the internet today


The movie Elysium shows this ruling class in space, proletariat on Earth, scenario in very high fidelity. The movies itself is just OK, but the glimpse of this future is very well executed in the production design and special effects. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Elysium_(film)


Who could have predicted that drones flying outside during the day might have to deal with direct sunlight?


No one could have known. And in Phoenix, no less, where it's famously overcast most of the time? Next you're going to tell me that a component overheated or clocked down for thermal throttling - preposterous, Phoenix is great for passive cooling! /s


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: