Is it just me or it is not a very impressive document. They basically "find and replace" a few terms by hacker and malware.
We could summarize it by : respect the existing law.
I did a quick search recently to better understand the difference between Quora's Poe vs GPT, and I found a pretty confusing, contradictory and illuminating answer.
This is a fantastic project, and we need more of those.
Let's keep in mind that 50% of the world's population did not connect to the internet in the last three months (last un UN starts).
On my end, I worked on an Android version since getting & maintaining a Raspberry Pi or a Linux machine is difficult in remote communities - where finding reliable access to a network or electricity can be tricky. Still, you will see those inexpensive Android phones everywhere.
If you are curious: grey-box.ca/uni
Early stuff, but we managed to deploy and test in 12 countries, and we are looking for volunteers for some of our digital divide open-source projects.
Yeah a Pi is a completely terrible solution for something like this because it doesn't really play to any of its strengths. Android phones are cheaper, more reliable, have a built in battery, touchscreen, GPS and compass (so you can navigate with one too), and have you know... actual power management so you don't run out of said battery. Sometimes they're even dust and waterproof which is probably good in a tropical rainforest or a sandy desert.
Lol, if you have them at that price I'll take 5. More like $80-120 at current market rates, and then you still need to buy everything else that's already included in a phone.
I know this will get absolutely smashed but is this such a bad thing anymore ? If you can’t connect to the internet you’re immediately protected from a lot of garbage information, attention hijacking, scams and hacking, child grooming, IP theft, you’re job is probably a lot more secure etc.
I know there is access to information which is beneficial but at some stage I’m not convinced having internet access will necessarily be considered a luxury in the best future.
I know it’s an outrageous sounds claim but I still feel it could go either way.
Access to high-quality internet resources is absolutely a luxury. You can pick and choose what resources you want, it's not TV.
It's like saying that access to a well-stocked university library is not a privilege because most pop books that get published are crap. It's not even the same category of "book".
Negatives of the internet do exist but you're overstating your case. This is about getting basic resources to people who couldn't otherwise access them, I don't see how it can possibly be net negative.
The privilege is in being able to not have Internet access for an extended period and just enjoy life from a tropical beach, sipping on a mai tai, with no work to check-in on to make sure nothing's blown up. From the first world, only the middle class and higher can afford such a luxury. But the Internet is just so damned useful that, sure, it enables doomscrolling, but it enables so much more as a communication medium (the MVP for many businesses is a email address or a whatsapp number) that the assertion is just ignorant of life before the Internet.
Well, some content available through the internet is useful. That content was available on CD-ROMs in the '90s as encyclopedias.
The function provided with this project is some content available offline just like those CD-ROMs. You aren't going to be communicating with folks on the other side of the world via it. Ergo, it is not "the internet in a box".
> From the first world, only the middle class and higher can afford such a luxury.
That is a HN perspective.
Blue collar shift workers often leave the work at work, and don't 'hop on a call' outside work. I took a 4x10 shift job and it has good benefits and pays enough for vacations. For the extravagant luxuries, TGFBtc.
Also starting to believe that the real status symbol will be the ability to not have an internet connection or only connect at your own discretion.
I also see a lot of temptation especially in the IoT space to use the internet to control the devices against the users wishes and spy on the user.
You also see tge first attempts of devicemakers to actively ensure an internet connection themselves, independently of what the user set up. (I.e. Apple's Find My network, Amazon's Sidewalk, etc).
I don't think this will become less in the future.
I have a similar feeling. I think there is a definite lifecycle to consumer technology (on the internet you have things like wikipedia, youtube, social media, google search, but this also applies to things like smart phones, operating systems, tvs even).
These things all seem to follow a curve. They are released, adopted and improved, they become amazing, and then at some point they start to decline for whatever reason (even as they may be improving in some aspects - like smart tvs continue to get a better picture but only if you can stomach the extra ads, surveillance, and otherwise creepy anti features).
I wish I could just have windows 7 with security updates, a dumb tv with an awesome screen, almost no subscriptions or cloud based doodads.
Id love a frozen version of the internet that nobody can come along and ruin for whatever reason. Internet in a box seems like a good idea to me.
Thanks, I think we need to discuss this too. I don't believe we can wish the internet away, but we're still in internet infancy, the "wild west" of plugged in, always online, life. Regulators need to catch up, but at the moment they seem to miss the point, mainly trying to cash in and serve their own narrow interests.
We likely need a movement that promotes a healthier use of the tech, which could include things like making it socially unacceptable to be constantly hooked up to your phone, and hefty fines for the manufacturers whenever their hardware/software made clandestine surveillance possible.
If things like these are not technically or socially possible, then I'm guessing we'll see an "anti-internet" movement eventually, too.
Actually, such local "internet in the box" as per the linked article might prove to be a basis for one such "anti-internet" solution: detach from the internet as a whole and enable local communication, resources and traffic only.
Oh boi. Don't ever go outside your home because you may get robbed, stabbed, spat on, laughed at, run over, kidnapped, etc. And even worse things await unsupervised children! No fun can be had outside and all knowledge must be carefully curated.
I've been trying to get Termux/Alpine going on my old Android so I can install IIAB in it, for precisely all these reasons. But I'm linux-clueless and haven't had the best of luck.
UNI doesn't look like it's actually IIAB-on-Android, more like another similar project, yes?
Since no one mentioned it, I have a good news for you: it's a sweet spot between what a project manager needs and a team member needs, it's called a PERT estimate.
When asked to do an estimate, give your optimistic estimate, realistic estimate and pessimistic estimate.
This allows for a better idea of the risk and padding needed for this task (you don't need to add a buffer in any of those numbers) and the manager can use that to calculate a weighted average (very simple formula that you can find online).
It's in the PMBoK, so if you have a project manager, he/she should know about it.
If I may suggest, there is a solid tool called "Antidote" that does French and English, has a dedicated app and a chrome extension. It got me through my master.
I sent a message on Twitter asking him a bit more information about his license. (I'm working on a similar project to translate Ukrainian medial terms to French and English)
