U.S. anti-submarine doctrine for surface vessels is pretty much just “run away”, that’s how dangerous subs are, so that’s why U.S. CSGs often include an attack submarine escort.
Which isn’t quite accurate as for example people prefer to move out of their parent’s homes while young adults but aren’t necessarily homeless if they don’t.
Basic housing is a necessity, but people also huge homes and 2nd homes etc. So housing policy should therefore be more complicated than simply subsidizing anything you can call housing. Capping the home mortgage tax deduction at ~median home prices for example is probably a better use of government funds.
That is the object of the sentence. He is asking who the subject is, in other words the thing or person that is doing the housing of the people. Is it the government? Is it you? I'm currently responsible for housing myself, which is annoying so I would prefer someone else take on this responsibility.
I HATE the oily squares on my MacBook Air screen. I think the real issue is that there is zero space between the screen and the keyboard when the laptop is closed. I’ve started keeping a piece of printer paper between the screen and keyboard whenever I close it, and that helps but it’s annoying to have to do. So much so that I looked into getting a MBP but they have the same problem.
I'd take an ever so slightly thicker laptop that avoided this (never seen this on a Thinkpad for example) but Apple seems to be obsessed with the thinnest of everything possible
Most of the rest of the western world where there is decent employee protections there is usually a clause in the local version of the Basic Conditions of Employment act that reads something like:
"The employer shall provide the employee with all resources and materials necesary to complete the Work for which they have been employed."
I’ve learned that’s what’s the law and what’s done in practice are often quite different.
Eg. A tool belt may not be necessary to get your job done, so the company won’t provide one. However it may make the work experience a 100x better, so everyone is likely to have personally bought their own.
Yes, we need better laws and better enforcement. For some reason the modern conservative movement detests anything like this somehow suggesting this is in the employee’s interest because they now have more freedom.
One of the weirdest things for me when I moved to the USA was learning that car mechanics have their own tools... when they change workplaces they take their toolbox with them.
in some cases they do! a friend worked for a labour intensive job (X days on, Y days off) and they have a yearly use-it-or-lose-it allowance that he was allowed to claim expenses against for things like boots, jackets, safety gear, etc
the (former) employee keeps them (i imagine for a myriad of reasons like hygiene and various overheads it would take to track such)
things like tools (wrenches, drills, bits, etc) are separately supplied by the company per department/work area (sort of like hot desking in the office world) and stay with the company at all times
Guess it depends on field and where ya work. Places I've worked at will provide tools that you then keep. Only things I haven't kept are "Borrowed" tools which are your couple grand diagnostic tools, or other similar items.
All drills, anything I've bought through tool allowances, and the such, I've kept.
My dad would get a coupon for a pair of steel-toe boots every 5 years from his employer, and he got to keep the old boots after they "wore out". Now he's got a clean rack of pretty good looking boots after 25 years at the same place.
I’ve had… three separate employers provide me steel toe boots. (Well, had me buy some and reimbursed it.) All allowed me to keep them.
I think it’s mostly just a matter of people’s feet varying in size so much it’s not worth the hassle to try and provide them directly or get them back after, because I’ve had uniform shirts and pants and things taken back, washed, and given to someone else… just never shoes.
Whenever the slightest shred of pro-worker regulation, in this case even something that already exists, is being discussed, I can always count on HN’s strong US contingent to be dismissive and act like the rest of the world hasn’t solved this already.
What is rest of the world? I notice 100s of millions in Asia and Africa working in rather horrible condition compare to US at 1/10th of pay even after adjusting lower cost of living.
Who wears suits these days? I've only even interviewed at one place with so much as a dress code (Lockheed Martin, industrial year student 20 years ago, the Havant office is ridiculously close to my parent's house at the time, I didn't get the job anyway).
Yes, I briefly considered that idea and immediately discarded it. It would only make any sense at all in industries where the cubicles were a big part of the costs and margins were thin.
I'd say most industries do not match this description, and that most of the increase in the S&P500 over the last 40 years was due to real revenue growth, not cost cutting
reply