Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | krunck's commentslogin

That the US doesn't like it is the best justification for it.

Just installed pinfo. Nice. Thanks!

Cloudflare is investigating issues with our services and/or network. Users may experience errors or timeouts reaching Cloudflare’s network or services. We will update this status page to clarify the scope of impact as we continue the investigation. Feb 20, 2026 - 18:45 UTC

Cash has no consumer protections. I use it all the time. I don't expect to have any consumer protections from crypto either.

This isn't the argument against traditional payment systems you seem to think it is.

There's a reason most people in well-banked countries use plastic over cash these days, convenience and consumer protection are it; and even with cash, the barrier to entry for fraud is higher since at some point that cash will come into contact with the banking world, and will have to be accounted for. If your cash flow is suspicious enough, it'll be audited.


Cash has the protection that I don't get my wallet cleared because some JavaScript library got supply-chained.

Or less snarky: it's simply harder to steal something or defraud someone in meatspace than in the Internet, so less protection should be necessary.



Because the only way America can claim that socialism is bad is by beating it to a pulp and saying "Look! See how weak and broken it is!"

This is what any anti-intellectual perceives about the other side of the conflict: monstrous brute, having no other means to enforce his power except through force. In fact, this attitude reflects primarily his own psycho-epistemology.

Exactly. They should provide the user with a list of UUIDs(or any other randomish ID tied to the actual account) that can be used in the accounturi URL for these operations.

"growing solar and wind generation is increasing equipment wear and maintenance costs at its nuclear reactors."

One could also say: "Nuclear facilities not ready for 21st century power grids"


If we only know how to compete, we all lose.


Theoretically, we (NA in general) can compete. Basically we compete on productivity and cost.

Demand higher standard of STEM education by putting up tougher criteria. Kill happy education. We used to have tougher Mathematics in schools, why can't we do it now? We don't have to push it up to CJK level.

Keep housing at least stable for 10-20 years to gradually let inflation take down the real housing price to maybe half of current level. Or build massive social housing projects. Whatever to keep housing affordable to young people.

Keep food price stable by controlling inflation on that side. Yeah it sounds a bit contradictory to the previous one, but it depends on how heavy a hand the government wants to use.

Once you have affordable housing and food, you can keep salary at a relatively lower level. Once we achieve that, we might be able to compete with China in certain areas. And combine that with better education and more technicians/engineers, we might be able to compete on both productivity and cost.

The thing is no one wants this.


I also wonder if competition gets irrelevant with AI and robotics. Seems like capital and power are everything. Society needs to be redesigned.


This. And don't forget that most businesses have in their payment processing contract terms (set forth by Visa/MC ) that prevent the business from directly charging card users the card processing fees. Which means that everybody - even cash users - pay for those fees. What a racket.


I think this is one of the biggest issues here, that the EU is actually forbidding to charge credit card users the transaction fee. On the contrary, it should make it mandatory that card users have to pay the transaction fees themselves. This would automatically force card providers to reduce their fees, because nobody wants to use cards with high fees. It would also get rid of nonsensical cash-back systems.


The EU also regulated the fee to be very low, something like 0.1% of the transaction value, comparable to the implicit costs of handling cash. If it was America–style 5% then it would be a problem, but at 0.1% it's not.


The official Apple store (McShark) in Vienna used to pass this ~3% charge on to consumers (a few years ago, not sure if it's still true today - and also there is a real Apple Store now).


Wow I didn't see that. Usually it's forbidden in the terms of agreement between the merchant and the payment processor to add a surcharge for using the card so everyone else ends up subsidising it.

Vienna/Austria is such a strange place wrt payment right now. Some places are cashless, many are cash only, many are card only above a certain amount. I had one lady running a ramen restaurant accept instant SEPA.

And it's going to be interesting tax wise when they remove the requirement for receipts on transactions under 35 EUR.


There are lots of restaurants in the US these days that charge 3% for use of any credit card. One that I've been even has a sign posted at the entrance about it, that it's legal to do so. Must have gotten a lot of complaints that it was somehow illegal, or perhaps against card processing rules. Because it's one thing to post a sign that says you charge the fee, it's another for that sign to mention the legality of it.


This has broke down in the last 5 years in the Asean region. Now most shops (that still accept cards) charges you 3-5% if you pay with Visa/Mastercard.


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: