Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | more hakl's commentslogin

It's compliant with FSF's definition of free software (http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/free-sw.html) and Debian's guidelines (http://www.debian.org/social_contract).

Stallman himself agreed that it was a good thing for Xiph to relicense their libraries from the LGPL to a permissive free software license (http://lists.xiph.org/pipermail/icecast-dev/2001-February/00...):

In response to the change of license, Richard Stallman of the Free Software Foundation says, "I agree. It is wise to make some of the Ogg Vorbis code available for use in proprietary software, so that commercial companies doing proprietary software will use it, and help Vorbis succeed in competition with other formats that would be restricted against our use."


Well, we're talking about two things, really- the webm reference implementation and the license under which the patents covering the spec are licensed. I guess the reference implementation is free as in freedom, and the spec is free as in beer to re-implement. This is why 'free standard' is such a pithy and accurate description.


I don't think it's mean to be useful; just male nerds bonding over their (presumed) shared sexuality.


That's probably the cruelest thing I've ever read.


You may not be able to just feed Flash WebM files: Adobe has only committed to supporting the VP8 codec, not Vorbis or Matroska (http://blogs.adobe.com/flashplatform/2010/05/adobe_support_f...). I wonder if the primary purpose Flash video will be making timeshifting impractical for normal people through weird formats and protocols.


Does anyone know why the link to the fast version is called Linux/Unix? Is it just to make it salient to nerds?


From Scott Adams old blog post on the redesign of the website:

"The fascinating thing about the responses is that it revealed three distinct types of Dilbert readers:

The first group is the ultra-techies who have an almost romantic relationship with technology. For them, the new site felt like getting dumped by a lover. Their high-end technology (generally Linux) and security settings made much of the site inconvenient. Moreover, the use of Flash offended them on some deep emotional level.

The second group objected to the new level of color and complexity, and the associated slowness. They like their Dilbert comics simple, fast, and in two colors. Anything more is like putting pants on a cat.

The third group uses technology as nothing more than a tool, and subscribes to the philosophy that more free stuff is better than less free stuff. That group has embraced the new features on the site and spiked the traffic stats.

For you first two groups, if you promise to keep it to yourselves, we created a stripped-down Dilbert page with just the comic, some text navigation, and the archive: www.dilbert.com/fast. This alternate site is a minor secret, mentioned only here and in the text footnote to the regular site as “Linux/Unix.”"

(source: http://dilbertblog.typepad.com/the_dilbert_blog/2008/04/dilb...)


Most porn is quite distasteful, and streaming sites' tags are generally a mess (if they are even implemented).


I think the Whitehead quote applies as is: unnecessarily complex syntax makes me stupider.


They licensed tech from Imagination Technologies for their low-end GMA500 chip.


Found an article on switching to Vim after two decades of using Emacs: http://pinard.progiciels-bpi.ca/notes/Thoughts_on_editors.ht...

And another one on converting to Emacs from Vim: http://upsilon.cc/~zack/blog/posts/2008/10/from_Vim_to_Emacs...


Oracle has a project to run the metacircular JVM Maxine directly on Xen: http://labs.oracle.com/projects/guestvm/


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: