There's some hacking that has to go on at the OS level with OSX to have any monitor > 27 inches. The trouble lies in that the operating system wants to natively believe that you're actually using a TV, not a monitor.
Try reading the article: the departments take a loss on each student. (But we'll make it up on volume?) It's the other departments like liberal arts which are cross-subsidizing them. (Which is cheaper to teach, a computer lab or a poetry class?)
Students don't pay departments, they pay the university itself. The university determines the department's budget. So departments will have budgets which allocate the number of professors, instructors and teaching assistants. From there, they determine the number of courses and sections they can offer. And, from there, they will determine how many students they can handle.
If you set out to be great simple numbers mean you will most likely fail. The famous "mid-life crisis" can easily result. Best to accept that you most likely won't change the world, and be satisfied with things you can reasonably achieve.
I suppose it's the defeatist attitude that bothers me.
Yes, most people will become nothing, because they were never anything to begin with. But why not embrace your potential and fight for greatness. Humility, important - just as is managing your expectations, but acting powerless is so disturbingly passive and disappointing.
You define your greatness, and you fulfill that destiny. Acting as a passive being in life is boring, and meaningless. Accepting mediocrity is just one more step towards insignificance. Grasp your purpose through greatness and find something more rewarding that "accepting you won't change the world."
The "greatest" people want to change something, want to make things different, want to leave a lasting contribution - having that desire should be universally human. Farmers and factory workers are the ones who "accept their insignificance in civilization."
