This is rude. Don't talk to people like this. It's a self proclaimed simple tool to solve a simple, recurrent problem in my life. It also gives you a config file that lets you clone and link on any machine, pulls on sync, and puts the links in a consistent place. Nothing about it is complex or hard. But it's useful, and it's free.

Being dismissive like this doesn't make you look cool, it just makes you look like a dick.

That comment is hardly rude for HN, there are certainly no personal attacks such as yours which violate the guidelines. It may become rude to use Show HN for your Ai output, we will see.

Welcome to the pushback against the ai spam problem on HN, there will be false positives along the way back to balance

If you don't understand how the original comment and doubly so this comment are rude, then there's nothing I can do for you. Godspeed and best of luck with being angry on the internet.

Arch + KDE is pretty sweet. It looks gorgeous out of the box, and gives you a system that mostly just works but is still everything you love about Arch

Amen.

You’d be shocked at the amount of traction pure unabated slop gets here. HN is more winnowing chaff from wheat than anything else

Type the word porn. Self censorship is wrong.

You can't get perfection. The constraints / stakes are softer with what Mitchell is trying to solve i.e. it's not a big deal if one slips through. That being said, it's not hard to denounce the tree of folks rooted at the original bad actor.

> The interesting failure mode isn’t just “one bad actor slips through”, it’s provenance: if you want to > “denounce the tree rooted at a bad actor”, you need to record where a vouch came from (maintainer X, > imported list Y, date, reason), otherwise revocation turns into manual whack-a-mole. > > Keeping the file format minimal is good, but I’d want at least optional provenance in the details field > (or a sidecar) so you can do bulk revocations and audits.

Oops! Usually, I just post good stuff I find and the dupe detector catches it and does the thing where it redirects you to the existing post. Apologies!

Not your fault - in this case the URLs were (originally) different. We'll merge the threads now!

…what? It is quite literally the opposite. This isn’t a matter of taste or perception.

I like your writing. Do you have a blog or publish anywhere else?

It’s not a good thing, because it’s not a thing. The title is a sarcastic reference to the fact that it uses an order of magnitude more instructions per frame than SM64 did

Sorry, I was referring less to the sarcastic elements of this article and more the not sarcastic elements of the Claude Code engineer's post on Twitter / Bsky.

Ah, I understand. Yeah, it read to me as a "good thing" in the sense of "look, it's slow, but it has to be slow". That the complexity was inherent and therefore in some sense good.