Anthropic bonuses seem to be code for "your usage limits are going down soon."

Literally every time

Are you using Pi with a cloud subscription, or are you using the API?

I can't imagine the logic chain that made you come to that conclusion.

There's a big difference between non-compliant, illegal, and criminal.

But increases credibility?

Sure, but the subtasks don't feel completely disparate, probably because there's shared context in working memory.

$100 is for casual usage. To use it for work requires $200/mi plus extra usage.

CC does all of my work and I have hit the $100/mo Max plan limit only once, and I probably could have just called it quits for the day at that point.

Are you saying that is the Claude rules for the subscription or saying because work uses more of it?

I ofter wonder if I'm missing something, but shouldn't we be able to edit the context manually???

In that way we could erase prompts and responses that didn't yield anything useful or derailed the model.

Why can't we do that?

I agree, but at the same time it feels like victim blaming.

I don't know. Is pointing out that someone holding a drill by the chuck won't get the results they expect that bad?

But what if the drill is non deterministic?

Nah, it's a variant of the XY Problem: https://xyproblem.info

How are you rolling back a conversation? I didn't know tools exposed that functionality.

For both claude-code or gemini-cli, hit escape twice, or, /rewind.