I feel sorry for people who have to write native JS at this point. I can't imagine a JS job interview where you didn't have to know of/about yet another framework.
Great to have some innovation on the frontend for once. We're getting closer and closer to a place where we can write flexible, performant interfaces without the heavy frameworks and tooling of native frontend dev.
Blackberry had a qwerty board on their phones long before anyone else and yet they decided to rely on being the only player in town instead of innovating. I hope Firefox OS takes over and the Blackberry CEO has no choice but to switch to it because of the great ecosystem.
Alternative: go full-on emacs, without evil. I think you need to do that, at least at first, to really learn emacs.
How to still get your work done: continue to use vim for your "work," and at first just use emacs to learn emacs. As soon as practical, start using emacs to do just one thing from your work. Somewhere soon after this you'll be comfortable enough to do everything from emacs (although still not an expert), and then you'll be able to decide to stick with it or go back.
I started to learn Emacs with its native commands and shortcuts. But I switched to evil when I noticed than I was unable to memorize the shortcuts for some basic actions like "add a character to the end of each line".
Today I use evil-mode for all tasks and to be honest I don't think I'm missing something.
The Emacs shortcuts are not mandatory to benefit of the power of Emacs, which resides essentially into its modularity and plugins.
I wouldn't call it a cult. I find a lot of people who write CL / SBCL don't care much for Clojure. That was a few years ago though, so maybe this has changed?
It's interesting to see one of my favorite sites doing this. There's always https://openlibrary.org/ which is ran by https://archive.org/ . I imagine Open Library has many of the same books.
Not trying to be cynical about this, but: You want nice things, not bitcoins and not dollars.
Currently, more market actors accept dollars (or Euros, or JPY, or UKP) than bitcoin, hence you're closer to the things you desire if you have dollar liquidity than if you have bitcoin liquidity.
Investments, on the other hand, should be neither in dollars nor in bitcoins, because dollars have inflation and bitcoin is too volatile.
If you truly believe in Bitcoin, you believe that a) there is a good chance that in the future USD, JPY, EU, UKP et al. will be worthless relics, ornaments in a history museum that schoolchildren laugh and joke about and b) that the world would be a massively, massively better place if a) were to eventuate.
Your job is to buy as much Bitcoin as you can as cheaply as possible, cross your fingers and try and do whatever you can to make a) happen, while spending at little of your BTC as possible. You hope to profit immensely but you are also excited for how the world as a whole will profit.
If a) doesn't happen, then you basically have to go back to the drawing board for imagining a way for society to progress and you to make some money.
> If you truly believe in Bitcoin, you believe that a) there is a good chance that in the future USD, JPY, EU, UKP et al. will be worthless relics
"believe"? You sound like a cult member. There is 0% chance that the world currencies will disappear anytime soon. If it did, bitcoins would be worth nothing anyways.
> will be worthless relics, ornaments in a history museum that schoolchildren laugh and joke
I think you are describing bitcoins...
The pathetic desperation of bitcoin fanatics like you is laughable. It's like listening to a retarded islamist.