It works better with editorial content, like blogs, guides, etc.

Do you want me to run it on your site?

Yes please! Or should I submit it on your website (with my email) so I can get a report?

Btw given the increasing number of AI website builders, you could consider expanding this tool to any webpage, just my 2 cents.

Submitted through your website anyway. I can see the value of this tool given the explosive growth of AI-generated content.

Here it is! I front-run you a bit :)

http://reports.topical.so/crafto-ai-z0itcrpe1tl2h910yrf3qxkm

Thanks for front-running it! It is mostly spot-on - as a solo builder who recently spent 2 days learning SEO and iterating/expanding my website from a single landing page, your report caught many of the issues I am aware of (thin content, some dup pages, missing/inaccurate metadata, H1, need better backlinks, etc), as well as things I haven't fully learned (content gaps and cluster). This would've easily saved me a good amount of those 2 days as a beginner.

It seems the "how to improve" part is mostly based on my current website structure (which is fair). What I'm personally doing now is looking more into the specific area/keywords/competitors my site is in, and thinking about what content, keywords, blogs, or even formats (e.g., adding graphs, stats, quotes vs. plain text) need improvement. This part is obviously more manual, time-consuming, and domain-specific, but I'd consider paying for it if your tool offered this as a premium feature.

Perfect, I will send it to you when it is done! The ETA is 6 hours due to backlog.

Thanks for the tip! Technically, it works on every website, but I still need to review the results more thoroughly for full-site crawls. For pages with lots of content it works really well now.

I just added a new icon, much better. Thanks for the tip!

https://qdorks.com

The idea is to write one query and be able to view results on the major search engines. I have to investigate the supported advanced search feature for each first...

I didn't knew about pws and just added it! Thanks.

For country, I am using cr and language the cl query param.

Thanks for letting me know, going to fix this asap!

Same for iOS Firefox

Firefox on iOS is just Safari in different clothes. Same engine.

There are some options for date-ranges, but haven't implemented this yet. Will dive into it and add something more flexible!

Thanks, and that indeed looks a bit sad. Going on the hunt for something more colourful and let you know!

It is not always 100% accurate, but still pretty good after a number of different tries.

Google uses different ways to decide if a webpage belongs to a specific country. Like domain name, search console country setting, server location, language, etc. Not sure if it's always 100% accurate...

Gotcha.. this makes sense. I was hung up on what they even meant by a website belonging to a particular country (as if we're all patriotically running sites on local servers or something).

Good catch! I had a look, and it didn't work because of the flags, moving them after the country names fixed it. Thanks!