Vitamin C is a water soluble vitamin. It’s pretty damn hard to get Vitamin C toxicity from overconsumption. It’s not really something to worry about. This is true for all the water soluble vitamins.
This isn’t true for the fat soluble vitamins. Those are Vitamin A, Vitamin E, Vitamin K and Vitamin D.
You can overdose and get toxicity if you consume too much of these. For Vitamin D you can’t overdose from what your body generates from the skin but you can from the oral forms.
In reality lifestyle modifications are more conservative than using a medication so lifestyle modification would be first line from an ethical perspective.
In reality though it does seem like statins are used first line by many clinicians. But ethically speaking conservative interventions like lifestyle modification in terms of changing diet and exercise should be used prior to medicating a young otherwise healthy person.
In other groups such as when someone has had a recent heart attack of course the thought process is different. Such people should be immediately placed on a statin.
No, because we have a huge body of evidence pointing to both the safety and efficacy of lipid lowering medications. We know that as far as LDL-c goes, the lower the better, so since we have safe drugs that lower more effectively than lifestyle interventions, these are the first line option in most cases.
I heard about this study while listening to BBC Newshour.
One of the scientists discussing the study mentioned that this is important because studies have shown that normally word use doesn’t change with aging.
So being able to detect these dementia signs earlier can be used to provide earlier dementia interventions to help people.
That was before Tim Cook presented Donald Trump with a gold and glass plaque along with a Mac Pro.
We live in far different times these days. I have no doubt in my mind that Apple is complying 100% with every LE request coming their way (not only because of the above gesture, but because it's actually the law)
There is a fundamental difference between the executive branch "requesting" information and the judicial branch issuing a warrant/subpoena. In the former, it is perfectly legal for Apple to say piss off. In the latter, it is absolutely not.
The US Government issues National Security Letters to every tech company operating in the United States, and it is legally mandated that companies comply with these subpoenas. So if Apple or Microsoft receive an NSL, the US Government is going to get your information. This includes anything you've uploaded to iCloud and anything in your Microsoft account/OneDrive/Bitlocker recovery keys/etc.
You are essentially saying “The enemies of a government seek to undermine it so let’s stop people from talking to each other.”
I mean how is that logic different from what Stalin did during the Soviet Union? “The capitalists want to overthrow us, let’s deploy the totalitarian surveillance state to control and monitor the people to stop them from rising up”.
And how is any of this logic compatible with democracy or human liberty?
The use of an external threat to justify internal suppression of basic human freedoms such as the freedom of speech. Freedom of speech naturally includes the ability to communicate with others. When the government blocks people from communicating with each other using an external threat as an excuse that is Orwellian.
It is Orwellian because in George Orwell’s novel 1984 the 3 governments remaining in the world are at war with each other and each government uses the threat of the others for total surveillance and suppression of their own populations.
The Revolutions of 1989 that led to the fall of the iron curtain were bottom up in a region with a large population.
In August of 1989, 2 million people held hands to create a chain. This was one of the large protests in human history. It led to the death of communism in Europe. More information in “The Baltic Way” article below.
China also has many different cultures, languages and so on for the over 1.4 billion people who live there. Why would the “nuance” of Europe be “lost” on a Chinese person?
China mostly has a single national identity, and provincial differences are way too nuanced to be mapped in the same way that country differences in Europe would be. It would be like trying to get Americans to understand that "Henan man" is a meme similar to the "Florida man" meme.
No, guangxi isn’t even technically a province (another weirdness), but having been to guangxi a few times (Guilin, Liuzhou, and Nanning), I don’t think anyone thinks much of it beyond it’s beautiful karst and southern culture. Anyways, there is actually a wiki article on henan: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anti-Henan_sentiment
double ironically, your comment precisely answers your question
the two of you operate on different scale of unification - what you see as "many different cultures", chinese and americans see as "a single country". What they see as "Europe pulling in many directions" - you might see as independent national interests
perhaps the best way to recognize the attitude is to think what you feel about subsections of your country - while Scotland/England divide is common, it's rarer to hear in what Yorkshire differs from the Cornwall; and I bet not many people would guess what beef is there between french citizen from Normandy and from Nice
it is this kind of scale that allows China to build transmission lines through the whole country's diameter. It is that kind of scale that made americans scream at each other because of abortion high court decision - while said decision simply said "let states decide"
it's a lot of difference, and there's a lot of nuances "on both sides" - but simply of a different kind
Vitamin C is a water soluble vitamin. It’s pretty damn hard to get Vitamin C toxicity from overconsumption. It’s not really something to worry about. This is true for all the water soluble vitamins.
This isn’t true for the fat soluble vitamins. Those are Vitamin A, Vitamin E, Vitamin K and Vitamin D.
You can overdose and get toxicity if you consume too much of these. For Vitamin D you can’t overdose from what your body generates from the skin but you can from the oral forms.
reply